Nice, FS is better in my opinion, I'll take the DVDr though.

9.5/9.5/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

10/9/9!!

Great release! The DVDR has to be next!!!!! *jumping up and down*

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by dos000
Nice, FS is better in my opinion, I'll take the DVDr though.

9.5/9.5/?

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

OH Cmon Centropy.First Spiderman 2 and Now Harry Potter 3 both FullScreen.I hope there is a WS rls in our very near future Oh well, thanx but i'll wait. PRops on the release!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

3 posts, 2 mentioning quality of the release.
Batting 66% ain't bad I guess.

But let's up it to 75% here.
Good clean picture, and I won't argue that I am hoping that this is like Shrek 2 was (FS then WS), so I only downloaded a few rars to see a sample and it's typical CTP + DVD = Great SVCD.

If FS is your thing, you got kids to show it to, and don't have a DVD Burner, then here's pretty much the best you can get before buying the retail.

9/9/9 Enjoyed it a lot, blah blah blah.

Last edited by Enzomatrx on 09-26-2004 at 11:57 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

9/9/?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

9/9/4

oh yeah its a harry potter ^.ô

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

The DVDR is now officially out.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

thanks Centropy for this much awaited dvd rip. now ill get piece and quiet from the kids. pic is as good as shrek 2. 9/9/7

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

weee..finally, hopefully ws will be out soon, but i'll grab this. Didn't care for the movie much, i think the directing ruined it, but that's just my opinion...glad they have a new director for the next movie.

Picture could be better, sound is perfect imo. Movie was just so-so. I hate it when they make "serious" movies funny .. like king arthur for example, and this one.

8.5/9.5/5

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by Redemption1980
FS is never better, no matter your opinion or TV, WS is how the movie was intended to be shown.
8/9/8

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by sar
This movie was shot with Super 35 mm film, and that means that the FS cut actually shows more of the frame than the WS cut does.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by dret
OK
1. thats not true. because its an open matte frame the fs and ws image are always different. sometime the fs will show more and sometimes the ws image will.
2. He didnt say anything about WS showing more. He said it was how the movie was meant to be seen. Since the theatrical release is widescreen, I think thats how it was meant to be seen.

---

OK
1. Of course the FS and the WS versions will be different. Being that this was shot on 35mm film, which has an aspect ration of 1.37:1, you only lose very little when cropping it to 1:33:1 (4:3). The FS version will always show more in this case, do the math
2. As long as we're nitpicking, then I never said that the FS version was how it was meant to be seen either It's really up to the director in this case - maybe he only had the WS cut in mind when he framed the pictures, maybe he had both the WS and the FS versions in mind (more likely). And again, of course the theatrical version is widescreen - I don't think you'll find many 4:3 movie theatres nowadays.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Yes, I did mean that the WS was how it was meant to be seen, not which version show more image.

I doubt the Director had the WS and FS image in mind when filming, thats not how most Directors think, but that is how Studios think.
And i imagine all the FS people would hate it to go to a 4:3 Cinema, probably most would ask why it wasn't Full Screen.

quote:

---

Being that this was shot on 35mm film, which has an aspect ration of 1.37:1, you only lose very little when cropping it to 1:33:1 (4:3).

---

Maybe im nitpicking now, but thats wrong. Standard 35mm film actually has a ratio of 1:33:1 so there is no cropping, but Super35mm has the soundtrack lines removed, and they are used to film, so the AR is now 1:66:1.

Also the special effects for films are usually created for the WS version only, as using the whole film area takes more time and costs more money, so is hardly used, so most Special effects shots are cropped from the WS version.

Last edited by Redemption1980 on 09-28-2004 at 10:49 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Nice job Centropy

9/9/9

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

OMG

I cant believe this is true a DVD of Harry Potter OMG i love this movie i can sit and watch a Super Good Quality Movie over and over and over and over againg Thanks CTP u make 12 year olds Like Me Very Happy

__________________
uTcRew

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged