Dromedary
Aug 2008
Registered
|
can't believe no one has caught this yet.
there are reasons why it is a bad crap. it's because it's not a TS, it's a cam. a very well done cam at that.
the problem with this guy's cam though, is he was sitting too close and too far to the left. this caused them to have to overcrop it to make it _appear_ to have clean edges, but in reality it's a cam.
props for a well done cam. if the video source is the same as others, it must have been a cam as well (didn't see), it's decent considering it's a cam. it's pretty not cool to improperly label your releases though IMO.
if no one can tell the difference between a TS and a cam these days, that's kinda sad.
centropy, where are you when we need you most one of the greatest movie releases. a nice svcd TS like spiderman was done for this movie would have been awesome. a shame svcd releases are becomming extinct =\ the quality is truly sub-par on many levels.
::EDIT:: I've deleted three posts that were pointing out the OBVIOUS error in the above... Don't stray off-topic folks, stick to reviewing this release. As for you Dromedary, you need to look-up the definition of what a TS (Telesync) is: http://www.vcdquality.com/index.php?page=faq cos you just made yourself look like a tit AND you didn't review the release oh yeah, you've also been quoted in the VCDQ "Hall of Shame" http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=25880 - Neversoft::
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|